Sign in
Join
Help
VetSurgeon.
org
Home
News
Discussions
Jobs
Films
Films
All films
Veterinary Controversies
Veterinary Costs
Talking Points
Product Briefings
Cardiology
Dentistry
Dermatology
Diagnostic Imaging
Equine
Exotics
Farm Animal
Neurology
Ophthalmology
Orthopaedics
Pathology/Cytology
Soft Tissue Surgery
Menu
NEWS
NEWS
Email updates
Email updates
LATEST JOBS
Royal Tunbridge Wells
Small Animal Vet
Dundee City
Small Animal Vet
Berkhamsted
Small Animal Vet
Yate
Small Animal Vet
View all veterinary jobs
Options
Subscribe by email
More
Cancel
All Headlines >>
Warning: lack of 24 hour cover may seriously damage your career
Arlo Guthrie
VetSurgeon News
/cfs-filesystemfile/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/graphics-logos/vetsurgeon_2D00_news.gif?_=636335966444922000
Comments
0
16 Jan 2008 8:17 AM
Following a meeting between SPVS and the Royal College, SPVS president elect Richard Hillman has issued a warning that vets working in practices which fail to provide 24 hour emergency cover to patients are risking their careers, whether the practice is owned by a vet or a non-vet.
The RCVS confirmed that it will retain the requirement for provision of 24 hour cover in its Guide to Professional Conduct, despite the difficulties in conforming to the Working Time Directive.
Disciplinary action may be taken against any vet working for a practice which does not provide 24 hour cover, and vets risk being struck off even if they do not own the practice or the owner is not a veterinary surgeon.
Richard has welcomed the RCVS clarification of the issue for practising vets so that they aware of their personal liability and the potential threat to their livelihoods.
Richard said: “The Royal College recognises that there is a dilemma facing employers in that they have to meet working time regulations as well as complying with the Guide.
“SPVS wanted this issue clarified especially as the number of practices owned by non-vets is increasing.
“Although the RCVS cannot take any action against practice owners who are not veterinary surgeons, they will discipline any vets working for such a practice.
“This means the responsibility lies with every individual vet, so all practitioners need to be aware of this when they consider job offers and they must check their prospective employer is providing full cover.
“This clarification from RCVS also means that any vet whose current employer is failing to organise 24 hour cover in advance should move to another practice to safeguard their career”.
0 Comments
RELATED NEWS
Vetsure launches online medicines platform to help independent practices compete
Free tool to help practices create CMA-compliant website price lists
Whistleblower reveals corporate vet group's post-CMA price list
Veterinary organisations react to CMA’s final vet sector reforms
Topics
SPVS
Regulation
DISCUSSION
What do YOU think about this news? Log in or register to comment.
Log in
or
create an account
to join the discussion.
Claim CPD
Add the time spent on this item to my VetSurgeon.org Personal Development Record
Time Spent (minutes)
What I learned?
How will I put what I learned into practice?
Submit