<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/9740/the-bvu-response-to-rcvs-draft-code-of-conduct-for-vns</link><description> The BVU has submitted its response to the RCVS consultation on the draft Code of Conduct for Veterinary Nurses, which is available for viewing via a link on the home page of the vets4bvu website: www.bvu.org.uk 
 Shams Mir 
 Professional Advisory Committee</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/48811?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:04:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a3120393-06a2-420f-b814-e2f0b2efa415</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The original for vets is pretty unimpressive and the RCVS have outdone themselves with this five minute job. I do&amp;nbsp;despair!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry me being opinionated again!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/48785?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e3688386-87bf-4259-b655-9b7ccf9c57ce</guid><dc:creator>Mark Rowland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree I wonder how much was paid for 10 minutes on Word &amp;#39;97 and how much of our subs went into its production. Probably a few lunches involved also. Its an embarrassment imo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/48784?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:16:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b74d8e5f-e107-4fdf-92ea-3b8432d6e1c3</guid><dc:creator>Julian Earl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That is an excellent addressing of the utterly appalling cut and paste version that had been used. It beggars belief that&amp;nbsp;someone&amp;nbsp;thought that the original wording would be acceptable or adequate. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/48783?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:41:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:dd646fa1-c99e-41df-a16d-d396bd7becf6</guid><dc:creator>Mark Rowland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sir I like the cut of your jib!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: The BVU Response to RCVS draft Code of Conduct for VNs</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/48764?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:27:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4e10de25-47c5-4305-a6fd-6ad91d37a16f</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Shams, that&amp;#39;s very interesting for the fact that, as you point out, not a great deal of thought seems to have gone into the code. Have you posted it on &lt;a  target='_blank'  href="http://www.vetnurse.co.uk"&gt;www.vetnurse.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;? (I&amp;#39;ll go and&amp;nbsp;have a look). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>