<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Staphylectomy?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/7775/staphylectomy</link><description> Having just read the new RCVS news my eyebrows were raised at the DC hearing report for Mr Joseph Holmes. A staphylectomy I think is defined as &amp;quot;shortening the soft palate&amp;quot;. Now, not withstanding the possibility that Mr Holmes did something wrong, it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Staphylectomy?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37649?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 21:20:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9d650724-0a0f-491d-b4fd-c180a62cddac</guid><dc:creator>Michael Woodhouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Arlo Guthrie&amp;quot;]Please everyone, do not start new threads in the controversial section, as they do not appear in the main listings[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could they not appear in unread posts? It could be the most interesting section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can eat hedgehogs you know?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Staphylectomy?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37628?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 13:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:96125e67-6f5d-4241-9539-8bfa207f26ae</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Found this thread languishing in the controversial section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please everyone, do not start new threads in the controversial section, as they do not appear in the main listings, so you are unlikely to get much discussion going.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The controversial section is for me only&amp;nbsp;to move threads into when it all gets a bit heated!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Staphylectomy?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/35554?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:04:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a89339fd-b62c-43b9-8c2a-6d015cb666c9</guid><dc:creator>Alan Tevendale</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Would not all surgical procedures be BEST performed by a specialist?&amp;nbsp; That doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily mean that they all should be performed by a specialist.&amp;nbsp; Certainly not all clients would be able to afford such a luxuary.&amp;nbsp; When I see a case if I feel that the animal would be better suited to seeing a specialist I always offer this as an option.&amp;nbsp; By no means to all such cases go for referral and we often end up doing a fair number of&amp;nbsp;procedures that would be &amp;#39;best performed by a specialist&amp;#39;.&amp;nbsp; I would assume that most of us do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>