<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Revalidation</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/4767/revalidation</link><description> In the RCVS thread I have posted a file which is a pdf of the new revalidation criteria for anaesthetists - the reality, the detail. 
 I know what I think. 
 This is the future if you want it, but it&amp;#39;ll need a new VSA. 
 JGW </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Revalidation</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/15942?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:04:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:25517381-2430-4d87-9806-22734ba9f1cd</guid><dc:creator>Vikki Halliday LLB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it makes a lot of sense, and have said the same before.&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/emoticons/new/icon_smile.png" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>