<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>This is a quacker</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/4177/this-is-a-quacker</link><description> This is a Quacker. 
 In this very short news article, they have mentioned the &amp;#163;1000 cost of the op twice - sure want to get over the message we are expensive. I&amp;#39;m not sure if the op alone was &amp;#163;1000, or whether that includes all the preliminary investigation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: This is a quacker</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/12032?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:03:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:f1da3a6f-c77e-43c3-9aa9-bc29d1a6c66c</guid><dc:creator>Rebecca MacMillan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I read this article in the paper and from what I recall it said it included all investigation up to that point (e.g. bloods) plus the xrays, drip, operation, pain relief etc etc. However I no longer have the article to quote what it said word for word &lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/emoticons/new/icon_smile.png" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>