<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>If sacking a client after SAR are there any additional considerations?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/30813/if-sacking-a-client-after-sar-are-there-any-additional-considerations</link><description> I was initially interested in the question of &amp;quot;Could the request for a SAR be considered a reason to sack a client/&amp;quot; In the pragmatic yes category would be the fact that such requests are estimated to cost businesses in UK in excess of &amp;#163;1000 per request</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: If sacking a client after SAR are there any additional considerations?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/242802?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2023 09:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:6789949d-886b-4745-ae5d-40547881c6b1</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading the ICO (Information Commissioner&amp;#39;s Office&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/members/moose" class="internal-link view-user-profile"&gt;Neil Wheadon&lt;/a&gt;!) info on this, and it strikes me that a) the majority of the public probably doesn&amp;#39;t even know of the existence of a Subject Access Request. But for those that do, I guess the solution is to make it as easy as possible to give them what they want with the least effort on your part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I right in saying that in most cases a practice will hold client data a) in patient medical records and b) in email correspondence. Presumably the former is very easy to export and hand over.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As to the latter, well, that is a bit more challenging ... finding every email that references a client, including perhaps ones between you and a third party, such as a referral centre (in which, Sod&amp;#39;s Law, you will inevitably refer to the &amp;quot;nightmare client from hell&amp;quot;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Searching for those emails by name would not be 100% reliable (because names are not 100% unique and search engines not 100% reliable).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think I might be inclined to give every client a unique reference, and make sure it is in every email that refers to them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That way, a search for XDR23&amp;amp;$%&amp;pound;GH (or whatever) would immediately pull up every email ever written.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a  target='_blank'  href="https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/your-right-to-get-copies-of-your-data/"&gt;your-right-to-get-copies-of-your-data&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: If sacking a client after SAR are there any additional considerations?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/242801?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 17:27:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:475d543b-3fa9-46ca-b791-91f2249ec444</guid><dc:creator>Beats</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;apologies. i meant subject access request, not suspicious activity report.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ironically, using letters, e.g. when i email someone at work and refer to an internet discussion i had with N W who i consider an authority on abbreviations, i may be making less material to come up in a SAR email search for your name, thus leaving me with less material to manually filter through and if need be redact before providing to you material which, if&amp;nbsp;it had contained your name may have been considered personal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: If sacking a client after SAR are there any additional considerations?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/242800?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 17:19:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:7926aa32-3351-4783-aae7-a9d9ce049cb5</guid><dc:creator>Neil Wheadon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Campaign against using letters in everything including clinical notes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SAR????&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Neil  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>