<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vets holding dogs and cats in pictures</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/29301/vets-holding-dogs-and-cats-in-pictures</link><description> So checking lots of websites and just had an E mail from IDEXX, why do websites/webinars introducing staff always feel the need for a vet to be holding an animal? You don&amp;#39;t see farmers cuddling tractors, or doctors hugging patients. 
 I spoke to one</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Vets holding dogs and cats in pictures</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/224999?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:12:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:88d8fa93-89e1-4841-a79c-7122bc24dcf3</guid><dc:creator>Clive Ansell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess a website advertising services to the pet owning public, has too or needs too appeal to the general public and the s&lt;span&gt;illy coochie coochie-cooers out there.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find pictures of practice staff cuddling animals somewhat nauseating, whereas a good picture of an animal being held for anaesthesia, venepuncture, or for an ultrasound scan looks far more professional.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>