<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/25658/failed-microchip---who-is-responsible</link><description> We&amp;#39;ve recently had an erstwhile client come in (they jumped ship to the cheapo vaccination clinic) moaning because when that practice scanned the dog they couldn&amp;#39;t find a chip. We chipped it as a puppy November 2015 and scanned it immediately afterwards</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/178213?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:37:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:269ed281-1235-4a57-a935-974f1c7aba5a</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Thomas Johnson&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;robloxley&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an amusing tangent, some time was spent on Saturday trying to trace a microchip found when scanning a stray tomcat, aborted finally when someone pointed out they&amp;#39;d scanned the test chip - the one in the plastic bit on a string attached to the scanner...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do you have a test chip attached to the scanner? Surely this was an event waiting to happen?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The test chip is to check the scanner is working correctly when failing to find a chip in an animal; further training on correct use of the scanner will be circulated :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/178170?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:34:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b391db0d-338f-4a1c-b04a-8c8daeab7676</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;robloxley&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an amusing tangent, some time was spent on Saturday trying to trace a microchip found when scanning a stray tomcat, aborted finally when someone pointed out they&amp;#39;d scanned the test chip - the one in the plastic bit on a string attached to the scanner...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do you have a test chip attached to the scanner? Surely this was an event waiting to happen?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/178155?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:02:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:26aa1a0f-274a-4024-9423-6f228eff2842</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As an amusing tangent, some time was spent on Saturday trying to trace a microchip found when scanning a stray tomcat, aborted finally when someone pointed out they&amp;#39;d scanned the test chip - the one in the plastic bit on a string attached to the scanner...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/178153?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:34:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:23d96f94-428e-4fd8-8124-479e5b4473ac</guid><dc:creator>ih220</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A client once quoted the Sale of Goods Act at me in this scenario when I didn&amp;#39;t immediately agree to a replacement chip FOC (because I was an assistant and not in a position to agree such things myself).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177868?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:52:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:7a135740-48a7-430d-883d-bf4b67e2029a</guid><dc:creator>Jill Butterworth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would have replaced it FOC and claimed it back form the manufacturer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a &amp;#39;two people&amp;#39; scan rule , when a chip can&amp;#39;t be found on a stray, as there have been odd cases where a second scan has found it for no apparent reason.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177859?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:25:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:419749f5-2e75-41f7-8489-9378f5950774</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the failed chip is an Identichip then there is a form to send to them and they provide a replacement pretty much by return of post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a cheap &amp;#39;Halo&amp;#39; reader (as well as good ones). It picks up chips at 100 yards (non-EU!) but not one when it is inside the implant needle! Chips and readers can be a bit odd!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177858?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:25:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:09d6a35b-0422-4031-8814-1747815fd791</guid><dc:creator>Wren</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And also bear in mind that the cheap and nasty clinic may use an equally cheap and nasty scanner. I have a pretty expensive scanner for my horse work which regularly finds chips (in small animals and equines) which have been declared not present or not working after having been scanned with a cheaper version. I also always carry a spare set of batteries and change them if I can&amp;#39;t find a chip that is expected to be there. The vast majority of times this does the trick - there is no warning that the battery is low until it is virtually dead, yet the scanner stops picking all chips up long before that point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It worries me that if my dog went missing and was found that it might be in a situation where someone declared it &amp;#39;unchipped&amp;#39; because of any of the above scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177851?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:17:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9f5fd069-84a9-4280-98b8-94acbedbf730</guid><dc:creator>Michael Woodhouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We use Identichips and I have no idea whether we put the first one in or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177850?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:03:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9484d3a3-9b24-439c-b114-49b5da70d85e</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Mark Rowland&amp;quot;]I think they&amp;#39;ve sorted it now tho but would like to know if there are continuing issues[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We had one from that duff batch the other week - they&amp;#39;d ignored all contact from Virbac yrs ago - virbac sent us a cheque to cover the cost of a new chip and our time sorting it our with the client.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177841?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:34:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:3c3f8606-f054-48a8-a237-dec910a4b2fe</guid><dc:creator>Mark Rowland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Was it the virbac chip? They had a hell of a load of problems a few years ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Caused me loads of ball ache as one of my clients exports golden eagles to Korea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think they&amp;#39;ve sorted it now tho but would like to know if there are continuing issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177839?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:13:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d2b4b415-cca0-450f-831e-dfaf118128bc</guid><dc:creator>Michael Woodhouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are people removing the old chip? We currently have a dog which had a &amp;#39;failed&amp;#39; chip, checked by 2 readers and 2 vets as dead. New chip implanted. Now both chips will read. I can&amp;#39;t explain it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177829?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:22:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:7a3db86f-03dc-4039-a8d8-82ae3ae2adec</guid><dc:creator>Glenn Hodgson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d implant foc, report and get on with the day, for virtually all people. This is all I have ever done in the past. &amp;nbsp;This makes good business sense and is fine for the patient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However.... Harsh unreasonabalness is hard to tolerate and should not be encouraged. &amp;nbsp;Well done . &amp;nbsp;if you&amp;#39;re lucky he will tell his friends not to come and see you, they would probably shout at your reception and nursing team!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177822?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:13:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:cc5a6059-6452-4728-9200-59d29261ee2d</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Weigh up the pros and cons of helping a tos_er like this. Pro&amp;#39;s - gets him off your back, cons, the inevitable bitching and complaining to all and sundry about how awful you really are!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probably be extremely nice and re-chip (with gritted teeth) for a quieter life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177818?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:01:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:02f9fc62-d4c5-4958-b5b7-30d87ef32c51</guid><dc:creator>Martin Atkinson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Bob Russell&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fill in the adverse reaction to microchip form, get replacement chip from makers. [/quote] &amp;#39;twas wot I did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Bob Russell&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I consider it part of the &amp;#39;value added&amp;#39; service that differentiates us from the cheap and nasty chipping crowd.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]I admit a customer who has gone to the cheap vet down the road to get the dog neutered and came in all belligerent did not induce my best customer relations attidude!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177810?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:16:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:f153bfe5-5fdd-4cfe-b27d-00d737209442</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Fill in the adverse reaction to microchip form, get replacement chip from makers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I consider it part of the &amp;#39;value added&amp;#39; service that differentiates us from the cheap and nasty chipping crowd.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We offer a conditional lifetime guarantee on our chips. At most we lose a few minutes time doing paperwork.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our main chips are Identichip and Animalcare are good as gold at replacing the few that fail or migrate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Failed microchip - who is responsible</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/177808?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:06:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:38112048-a15c-4389-8619-645be7f7d7f6</guid><dc:creator>emma o&amp;amp;#39;connor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We would normally contact the manufacturer of the microchip, explain the failure to read it, and so far they have always provided us with a replacement microchip FOC which we then implant FOC for the client. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>