<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Barriers to EBVM</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/24656/barriers-to-ebvm</link><description> Hi, 
 I saw this survey asking the profession what they consider to be the barriers to implementing EBVM and what they think about EBVM. I thought it might be interesting to share it on here so that the researchers can gather the views of VetSurgeon</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Barriers to EBVM</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/163340?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:32:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d12318dc-c17b-455c-8363-cb0186206485</guid><dc:creator>grumpyoldman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Its all about the money really. Its great if the client has a big fat pet plan not so hot if they are quibbling over every penny ,then its pred or dead . &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Barriers to EBVM</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/163315?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 16:00:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c67b4dcf-6bdd-4ad5-a85f-8a03ad254d72</guid><dc:creator>Evelyn Barbour-Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve done it but I had to be creative with the answers. For one thing: journals, textbooks and internet searches &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;are&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;CPD so that question could not be answered properly. For another thing, the authors did not define what they mean by EBVM so many questions were difficult to answer. Finally, there was an obvious bias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>