<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>NSAID or steroids vs neoplasia?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/23469/nsaid-or-steroids-vs-neoplasia</link><description> Just a ponder, I seem to be seeing more confirmed neoplasia cases on palliative meloxicam when they return from local referral centres. Ive read a bit about the possible anti-tumour actions but was wondering when I should reach for an nsaid over some</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: NSAID or steroids vs neoplasia?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/146051?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:31:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:1f75b913-b987-4f68-8899-087e1ae045ea</guid><dc:creator>Richard Carter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Julian Earl&amp;quot;]undoubtedly use it again for a bladder tumour[/quote] +1 - spaniel with TCC, given appalling prognosis, put onto previcox and lived another 14 months, about 1 year without any overt repeat bleeding or discomfort but then the wheels fell off&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NSAID or steroids vs neoplasia?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/145899?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:26:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:772d478e-a0a6-4650-aa16-43cd21e676d3</guid><dc:creator>Julian Earl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Understand that Piroxicam is used for bladder tumours in human medicine, so following the recommendation to use meloxicam as the nearest licenced equivalent for dogs, I had a remarkable result in a dog with a tumour that I monitored on ultrasound. The symptoms were alleviated and blow me if the size of the tumour didn&amp;#39;t shrink to less than 50% of the original sizw! I was convinced and would undoubtedly use it again for a bladder tumour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HTH?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NSAID or steroids vs neoplasia?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/145882?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:51:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e2fe3cfd-b83f-4740-b043-a8f44f1dcd94</guid><dc:creator>Martin Atkinson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you hit the nail on the head there Emily. NSAIDs +/- metronomic cyclophosphamide for carcinomas/sarcomas and corticoids for lymphoma/leukaemias with COP/CHOP or whatever. Latest info I have is that piroxicam may be more efficacious that meloxicam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>