<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>CQC GP Practice monitoring</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/20693/cqc-gp-practice-monitoring</link><description> Here&amp;#39;s the link 
 http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/our-intelligent-monitoring-gp-practices 
 If ever there were a survey which required interpretation then this is it. The methodology and statistical analysis are there and I suppose political pressure</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator></channel></rss>