<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dangerous Dogs Act</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/20399/dangerous-dogs-act</link><description>I see the Dangerous Dogs Act has been updated today to allow prosecution following incidents on private property. Any thoughts on how this may affect those of us in practice? Will we obliged to report dogs we view to show aggressive behaviour on the basis</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Dangerous Dogs Act</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/122952?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:04:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:3531e9ca-fd60-428d-ab38-509970f21cd5</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m far more worried about the human criminals who aren&amp;#39;t reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>