<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/18179/elections-2014</link><description> Interestingly it seems the RCVS election Q&amp;amp;A&amp;#39;s seem to be via The Webinar Vet this year rather than on an open forum! 
 Did it get too heated here last year? Did candidates and the RCVS have too little control? 
 </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110094?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:39:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:3cceb1c7-6c71-4bb4-aad1-c2ab9679fac4</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Arlo Guthrie&amp;quot;]The RCVS has never even tried to exercise any control over election discussions in these forums (over any discussions, actually). In fact, quite the reverse[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surely their engagement with digital media is more than a token annual appearance from an RCVS employee?! &lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/emoticons/v2/Winking_smiley.gif" alt="Wink" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110075?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:51:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:8bd271c7-7f55-4e1a-bcb6-a0a471c62947</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Todd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn&amp;#39;t anyone think we could, tailor a candidate collectively??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all we represent the most vocal argumentative but ultimately caring and sensible group of vets in the profession and any contra opinion gets pretty soon squashed. &amp;nbsp;[The thinking ones among us don&amp;#39;t award red stars]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;ve got a year to discuss it!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110073?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:43:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ea94822f-f74e-4691-bf30-b3be5e884798</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Anthony Todd&amp;quot;]
&lt;p&gt;Pity there isn&amp;#39;t a single vetsurgeon.org candidate!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="CLEAR:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know this is an idea that regularly rears its head; but I don&amp;#39;t see how, with the wide range of opinions held by contributors to the forums, one person could represent us all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110072?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:43:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9a65bef6-fbf4-4669-983b-8c0dd5ee9baf</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;But there isn&amp;#39;t a single vetsurgeon.org set of opinions!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110070?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:36:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:993fd88a-852f-4b2b-9f93-c035f9d767c1</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Todd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pity there isn&amp;#39;t a single vetsurgeon.org candidate!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110037?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:06:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:2a922d89-6e1d-4808-84d3-5f67dfeb5614</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to hear it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not seen any signs that anyone was interested in Q&amp;amp;A other than here. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Elections 2014</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/110036?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:00:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:2f4cbb28-4fa8-4ecd-99be-fa07c41cb049</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Bob Russell&amp;quot;]Interestingly it seems the RCVS election Q&amp;amp;A&amp;#39;s seem to be via The Webinar Vet this year rather than on an open forum!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did it get too heated here last year? Did candidates and the RCVS have too little control?[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nope.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last year, I invited all candidates to come and participate in the forums here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This year, I&amp;#39;m going to do exactly the same!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RCVS has never even tried to exercise any control over election discussions in these forums (over any discussions, actually). In fact, quite the reverse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>