<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/16175/microchip-not-working</link><description> Hi, 
 Since the last update regarding client confidentiality ( https://www.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/client-confidentiality-and-microchipped-animals-flow-chart/ ), my main client (practice) had asked all vets to check microchips at all consultations</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96469?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:10:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:96694a7f-b036-46d4-a05c-a855a81d98a1</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Winder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently dealt with a client who had a litter of 7 pups chipped at her previous vets ( they used Virbac). 5 of those have now failed yet only one was apparently in the batch which was faulty. Hence only 1 client had been contacted by Virbac-&amp;nbsp;1 other found out when on the continent and trying to re-enter the UK! when I spoke to Virbac they didn&amp;#39;t seem at all surprised despite me saying that these were not supposed to be faulty batch numbers- made me wonder how many others&amp;nbsp;have failed and the owners aren&amp;#39;t aware.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96391?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:52:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:2e3dc9d1-92af-42c4-aa03-089d5f78a70e</guid><dc:creator>Niall Taylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Francisco Gomez&amp;quot;]The owners were told (by letter) to pop their animals to their practice and to check if the chip was indeed working. The ones that didn&amp;#39;t, Backhome would provide with another one FOC[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There has been another letter since then where Virbac acknowledged the stupidity of replacing only failed chips in a batch which were all likely to fail prematurely (including the day after the &amp;quot;check&amp;quot;). Clients who have a pet implanted with a chip from the dodgy batch should now have a second chip implanted, whether or not the original is working - how rubbish is that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Niall&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96389?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:14:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:8cd1582e-acd7-4bd3-b809-c4162922b623</guid><dc:creator>Evelyn Barbour-Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Francisco Gomez&amp;quot;]Or are we now obliged to check chips at every consultation?[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96387?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:06:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:889314d3-93c1-46e7-81dd-92a24fde619c</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Francisco Gomez&amp;quot;]Firstly, I&amp;#39;d like to ask if this is a necessity. I mean, I am happy to follow practices protocols, but is this just a protocol? Or are we now obliged to check chips at every consultation?[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not a necessity or an obligation beyond practice protocol.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can see some good benefits, but opens a can of worms that I really don&amp;#39;t think is our job to police&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Francisco Gomez&amp;quot;]The problem now is that some of the chips that were working then, had stopped working now[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phone Virbac? They are helpful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96386?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:57:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d1dfc370-f9dc-4519-8ceb-575ffdadc2bd</guid><dc:creator>Francisco Gomez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;James Laidlaw&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think virbac had a run with failed batches- link -&amp;nbsp;&lt;a  target='_blank'  href="https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;oq=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.69i57.4129j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8"&gt;https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;oq=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.69i57.4129j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Top link is to the doc file relating to failed chips&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess all owners had received the letter from Virbac, but some of them had ignored it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96384?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:50:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:bd121535-3714-42fc-997a-fe874d378c47</guid><dc:creator>James Allsop</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to use the virbac chips and was caught out in the batch failures, approx 20% of those in the recall had stopped working. Although all chips replaced FOC still not great PR and I felt did reflect badly on the practice. I have changed to an alternative brand since&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96383?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:45:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e6e0d78e-70c9-45f6-bf6b-692710306535</guid><dc:creator>James Laidlaw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think virbac had a run with failed batches- link -&amp;nbsp;&lt;a  target='_blank'  href="https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;oq=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.69i57.4129j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8"&gt;https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;oq=defra+virbac+chip+failure&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.69i57.4129j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Top link is to the doc file relating to failed chips&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96379?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:43:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:fbb901a7-b784-42a6-b04a-5ee35ae3b03e</guid><dc:creator>Francisco Gomez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;ceri stewart&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know this may sound stupid, but were they tested with 2 scanners or could the scanner be dying?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not stupid at all. I used three different scanner brands, all full batteries and working with other chips.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96378?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:28:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:5b2fa6f3-344e-4bd0-ae05-76e576a5fbef</guid><dc:creator>ceri stewart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I know this may sound stupid, but were they tested with 2 scanners or could the scanner be dying?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96377?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:20:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:58915b2c-8b51-4cf3-bdf5-bcab3539e357</guid><dc:creator>Alan Tevendale</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t honestly remember any of the chips we&amp;#39;ve implanted ever failing.&amp;nbsp; Maybe we&amp;#39;ve just been lucky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microchip not working!</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/96375?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:12:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b59fd2f9-56ab-4dbd-8ec8-304c1cc7f799</guid><dc:creator>Martin Atkinson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Francisco Gomez&amp;quot;] Anyone else had experienced this?[/quote] No, I use idENTICHIP!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>