<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Trusting people, trusting candidates, trusting RCVS</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/14761/trusting-people-trusting-candidates-trusting-rcvs</link><description> RCVS isn&amp;#39;t an object. There are people there. I don&amp;#39;t trust a number of those people, based on their actions/inactions. Some of these people are candidates. If RCVS is to be relevant and function optimally it needs to be trustworthy. That trust lies</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator></channel></rss>