<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>No women standing for RCVS election</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/14701/no-women-standing-for-rcvs-election</link><description> There is this from Mrs Molyneux 
 http://www.rcvs.org.uk/news-and-events/news/no-women-standing-in-council-elections-jacqui-molyneux-responds/ 
 This is Mrs M through and through. She doesn&amp;#39;t understand what is putting women off. She is a woman. Amazing</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: No women standing for RCVS election</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/85215?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:40:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:77d2a80a-6eb3-4408-af86-229c61f79cbf</guid><dc:creator>J G Wray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been through all of the candidates manifestoes. Only Dr Ellis mentions the gender demographic as being important and part of the future of the profession. This may be because of personal association. Dr Davies doesn&amp;#39;t mention women, but he may have a similar association. Strange.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JGW&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>