<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Light at the end of the ARC tunnel?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/11149/light-at-the-end-of-the-arc-tunnel</link><description> News is that the temp Reg has had his proposals for the new ARC at RCVS to be council-dominated faced down. It will now have a majority of external people in its members, and Reg/Tres/Pres/PPs are barred from it. 
 A step in the right direction? </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Light at the end of the ARC tunnel?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/59020?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:47:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:22e22268-4bd0-4bf7-847e-ea1ae4ed5ca7</guid><dc:creator>Bob Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>