The new "code"

Re: The new "code"

Jon RUBEN — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:59:51 GMT

Simple answer with a couple of exceptions - don't vote for the people currently on the council

Current RCVS thinking seems to be that they know better than us lot in practice

PS don't vote for me unless you are against the cascade

Re: The new "code"

Mark Rowland — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:48:45 GMT

I agree I was watching a documentary on Chinas secret prisons last night. You turn up to a government building to complain and they show you to an empty office and just lock you in. Perhaps we should send Marc down there on our behalf?

Re: The new "code"

Mark Holmes — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:35:33 GMT

[quote user="Evelyn Barbour-Hill"]

Belgravia House reminds me of the government of China or the old USSR.

[/quote]

You know what - I had exactly the same thought only recently. I have visions of a lone Veterinary Surgeon standing in protest outside Belgravia House and being run down by a Volvo Estate. A job for Marc Abraham perhaps?

Re: The new "code"

Bob Russell — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:15:48 GMT

No surprise. The RCVS clearly feels above listening and sadly seem to be climbing up their own ar*es.

Not surprising that they have included PSS as part of the 'code'.

i am sure they have a benign, paternal eye on us all. Mao Tse Tung and Stalin had a similar approach.

Re: The new "code"

Mark Rowland — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:11:28 GMT

Actually not so much a consultation as a post op check perchance

Re: The new "code"

Niall Taylor — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:03:39 GMT

[quote user="Evelyn Barbour-Hill"]They had the "consultation exercise", ticked that box, and proceeded with the original plan.[/quote]

I wonder if they actually took any ideas from members on board?

Niall