<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sensitivity of the TB skin test decreasing?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/9961/sensitivity-of-the-tb-skin-test-decreasing</link><description> Last night we had a farmers&amp;#39; meeting on TB prevention. I was explaining what a sensitivity of 80% of the skin test means: that for every 4 reactors found, one was missed. Then a farmer asked a question which has kept me thinking since: 
 Isn&amp;#39;t there</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Sensitivity of the TB skin test decreasing?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/50130?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:10:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:482c6188-b78f-441d-9533-d794575ab5de</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;All I know is that TB can remain dormant for years due to the immune response Eventually the immune response fails,which is when the animal develops clinical disease&amp;nbsp; So you can keep testing and removing reactors,whilst the old emaciated cow who&amp;#39;s infecting them all passes every test&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having said that modern dairy cows rarely live long enough to get tothat stage, and that was back in the days of 3 yearly TB tests,so the active case was assumed to have been reactive in the past-just not been tested at that time&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>