<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/9132/histology</link><description> Out of interest, do people send all masses for histology regardless of what they appear to be? [Poll]</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43894?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:34:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:424ddc71-d54e-4d6c-8077-5839efbd6f14</guid><dc:creator>Michael Woodhouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We keep a bit in a pot. Have a cupboard with lots of universals, sheep vas deferens going back many years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would say 1 in 4 we send off, the others we often keep a bit, unless fairly sure it&amp;#39;s just a lipoma. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In real life once a lump has been removed unlikely do do anything else. If it comes back it&amp;#39;s probably nasty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43891?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:52:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d615fc68-02bb-47fb-95e4-4c47fcc5079c</guid><dc:creator>Richard Fox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup I think that about sums it up - If it floats then its fat if it doesn&amp;#39;t then it is probably a &amp;quot;haemangipericytoma&amp;quot; as they often look like firm lipomas (common differential on submission) - I used to take lumps off then store them for a few weeks/months if the owners didn&amp;#39;t want the tissue sent off - but just chucking it away (unless you are sure what it is) often leads to re-biopsy when it comes back or doesn&amp;#39;t heal IME?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43885?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:11:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ec830bd7-cf08-4d5c-bc87-7125502c657d</guid><dc:creator>Clive Ansell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I always give the option of, although I might say I feel there is no real need.&amp;nbsp; Lipomas for example; I will say I am 99% happy it is a lipoma -if it looks like, smells like, feels like, behaves like&amp;nbsp;and quacks like a lipoma, it&amp;#39;s probably a lipoma - but for 100% confirmation histology is needed - that way my arse is covered. Give the option and let the client decide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Where clients don&amp;#39;t have the money, I offer and advise but it is up to them to make the call and decline if they wish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One practice I once locumed in used to include histology within the surgical fee for insured animals not giving clients the option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A petaid a practice I work in occasionally always offer/advise histology, but clients have to pay, it is not usually (can be done if vet feels essential)&amp;nbsp;included within the scheme. most will decline. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43879?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:04:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d63ea5ea-8581-406e-9272-ffd35d24d02f</guid><dc:creator>Richard Fox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If lesions could be diagnosed grossly, consistently, then there would be no need for diagnostic pathologists! I would say that about 20% of lesions submitted with a preliminary diagnosis are correct or in the right ball park! (Well in the last 12 years I have been doing pathology)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43876?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:32:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:10c7dcbb-f265-49c6-b1e3-0d3e1212b632</guid><dc:creator>Stephen Courtney</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Robin Grimmer&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I always recommend histology for everything. I had my fingers burnt once when I thought a mass on a dog&amp;#39;s gum was &amp;#39;just an epulis&amp;#39;. Well it was but unfortunately was acanthomatous epulis not ossifying, and even though doesn;t metastasise is locally invasive. So the dog ended up having some mandible removed and radiotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surely that outcome was going to happen anyway? the only issue is if a second surgery was needed to get a diagnosis that should have been made in the first place, or if definitive treatment was delayed resulting in more severe disease. But I agree, there is a strong tendency to attempt to diagnose lumps visually and it should be resisted strenuously!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I spent 2 years in a path lab doing PMs and reading slides including biopsies - and I&amp;#39;m amazed how often my guesses on the outcome of histology are waaaay off!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43873?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ffde6c89-4387-48d1-8fed-e7fe75c260d9</guid><dc:creator>Robin Grimmer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I always recommend histology for everything. I had my fingers burnt once when I thought a mass on a dog&amp;#39;s gum was &amp;#39;just an epulis&amp;#39;. Well it was but unfortunately was acanthomatous epulis not ossifying, and even though doesn;t metastasise is locally invasive. So the dog ended up having some mandible removed and radiotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43872?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:20:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:afcdebf2-5379-4c66-80ba-8c055c0c8e82</guid><dc:creator>Stephen Courtney</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I generally feel if a lump is worth removing, it is worth having histology. But sometimes owners prefer not to spend the money - for instance in older animals that are not candidates for chemo, radiotherapy or further surgery, and of course basic lipomas - confirmed by cytology - that float in formalin - are unlikely to be worth the cost of histology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is worth keeping suspicious lumps in formalin &amp;#39;in case&amp;#39; but I&amp;#39;m not too keen on that&amp;nbsp; because I ended up with a cupboard full of bits of tissue we were keeping &amp;#39;in case&amp;#39;!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, there is no point putting formalin pots with biopsies into the fridge - if anything you just slow down the fixation process. And once fixed they don&amp;#39;t need to be in the fridge anyway&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43870?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:943c192a-f111-4398-a410-44d126953dd7</guid><dc:creator>Richard Fox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43866?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:01:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a2d46233-7dfb-40a8-ad74-393e82ea4e31</guid><dc:creator>Dagmar Steele</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;same here, but I found the idea very helpful to keep suspicious lumps in formaldehyde if o can&amp;#39;t afford histo, so they can be examined if lump comes back (has been posted here recently) instead of jumping for another surgery without diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Histology</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/43865?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:46:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b20e1241-919b-4a94-af61-25a4cb9bc9bc</guid><dc:creator>Mark Hedberg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Option 3 here; i do it as often as I can but sometimes the money just isn&amp;#39;t there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>