<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/8181/ammonium-urate-in-a-pug</link><description> I inherited this case: a 2 year old female pug with a history of hematuria. Treated by other vets with short courses of antibiotics, but recurring. 
 Urine results (after a week marbocyl): blood 4+, sp gr 1.018, protein 3+, PH 9.0. Sediment: moderate</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37312?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 23:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b86df99c-abef-43dd-b190-bb979443c045</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely worth a 2nd urine sample to confirm urate crystals, cheap and easy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37302?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 20:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:146ccfe2-cb36-4433-baf8-dd849b95cea4</guid><dc:creator>Charlotte Marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would say that depends on the ultrasonographer. It should be pretty sensitive using ultrasound and less invasive but I have known stones to be missed by people not used to doing scans. Positive contrast radiography should definately show stones of any size.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37301?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 19:47:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9ad35f79-2da8-4a01-aad2-f406d91c7027</guid><dc:creator>ilanit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I will try to convince the owners to do the BA stim test (although I am not keeping my hopes up, they are really reluctant to do more tests&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/emoticons/v2/headbang2.gif" alt="Frustrated" /&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With test should be more sensitive to visualize the stones? they did not show on plain x-ray. Ultrasound or positive contrast x-ray?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37298?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 17:36:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:fc3f9b79-0a58-4de4-85f9-2b436d36841e</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Winder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would agree completely- have had 2 adult (one of them 5y.o.) dogs in the last year diagnosed with a PSS after urate stones. Neither had any other csx, had grown normally etc , so I&amp;#39;m now wary of assuming no risk of PSS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ammonium urate in a pug</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/37294?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 13:47:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:257def9f-1291-4bea-8c42-4c2ee33f8d6c</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;ilanit&amp;quot;]in a pug with no indication of having a PSS! Any thoughts on this?[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You haven&amp;#39;t yet completely ruled out a PSS though...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>