<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Complicated crown fracture or not?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/30660/complicated-crown-fracture-or-not</link><description> A colleague&amp;rsquo;s 3 yr old MN DSH chipped his canines a few weeks ago, came in for assessment under GA with radiographs- The radiograph of 104 looks like pulp cavity involved, but there is nothing to see/probe on surface. What are you opinions? 
 </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Complicated crown fracture or not?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/241574?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:bce555ad-ac13-4eca-8816-23dcc0885937</guid><dc:creator>Rob Davis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It can be difficult to tell with these - the pulp cavity extends close to the tip especially in young cats, but as it tapers it becomes extremely narrow.&amp;nbsp; Radiographs are not a reliable way of determining pulp exposure. If threre is absolutely no catching with a sharp explorer and no visible exposure of pulp (magnification is really helpful), then I would monitor this case. I would repeat the radiographs in a few months. If there has been pulp exposure then the pulp will die and you will see a cessation of dentine deposition (so the pulp will appear narrower in the contralateral tooth).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>