<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Request for input regarding Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/28825/request-for-input-regarding-pseudomonas-aeruginosa-detection</link><description> I represent a Danish R&amp;amp;D startup, PreDiagnose , which is developing time- and cost-effective point of care devices able to detect early and intermittent bacterial infections in a non-invasive manner. 
 
 We are exploring whether our upcoming product</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Request for input regarding Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/218914?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:17:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ffe981cd-5ceb-42aa-bd67-26a68b86cf45</guid><dc:creator>Sarah Keir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Currently - cytology and culture and sensitivity if rods found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Problems - none, it is confidently diagnosed by these methods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Special requirements - quicker, cheaper and as accurate as current methods.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>