<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>spaying and mammary masses - again...</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/28679/spaying-and-mammary-masses---again</link><description> open-access study for discussion: journals.plos.org/.../article </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: spaying and mammary masses - again...</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/217236?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:51:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:433a7c90-4774-4316-aa95-e388574651ac</guid><dc:creator>David Mills</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hell of a lot of subgroup analysis in that study. Does make me worried.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question surely is what are the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; tumours that are seen, and are they an issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further, it&amp;#39;s my pet theory that cruciate rupture occurs far more readily during oestrus, than anoestrus.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>