<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Media bias and science</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/27974/media-bias-and-science</link><description> I&amp;#39;m not in the business of knocking journals, and feel somewhat uncomfortable doing so, but yesterday I heard (and then wrote) a story about what happened when a scientist wrote and submitted an article to the Veterinary Record about alternative medicine</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Media bias and science</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/208530?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:25:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:d676537f-507d-42b2-a2db-e7b95a8b8873</guid><dc:creator>Robert FalconerTaylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe Prince Charles got Dr Ernst kicked out his job a while back so perhaps editor of VR is after a knighthood?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Media bias and science</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/208525?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:15:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:2dee716e-1ce7-44b8-8178-73e3f0016d6c</guid><dc:creator>Niall Taylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Iain Richards&amp;quot;]I&amp;#39;m making enquiries[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep us posted if that&amp;#39;s ok. The campaign for rational veterinary medicine has come across similar sentiments from Vet Times in the past regarding letters and articles about homeopathy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Niall&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Media bias and science</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/208521?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:04:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4c2b969f-e309-4b85-ac90-db928d0a1adc</guid><dc:creator>Iain Richards</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m puzzled by the VR response on this, really puzzled. SO I&amp;#39;m making enquiries&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Media bias and science</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/208507?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:07:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b9102c54-593e-4747-b0f0-f5423499f126</guid><dc:creator>Niall Taylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I read that blog entry from Prof Ernst and I have to say was a bit shocked myself to read how badly he was treated by the Vet Rec. How can you describe the &amp;#39;benefits&amp;#39; of a therapy which has been proven to be ineffective? But there is still a spurious belief that such articles have to be &amp;#39;balanced&amp;#39;. Sometimes some things are just plain wrong &lt;img src="/emoticons/v2/Eye_rolling_smiley.gif" alt="Exasperated" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Niall&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>