<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/26285/feline-caudal-buccal-granulomas</link><description> [As seen here: http://www.toothvet.ca/PDFfiles/Feline_Gum_Chewer.pdf ] 
 I have a 1y Devon Rex which has presented with a small granuloma caudal and labial to the caudal lower molar. Excisional biopsy under GA revealed non-specific inflammation and radiography</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186713?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:06:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a904dae3-98dd-4424-9330-cbad02bb83e9</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Todd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PS so long as, for a nanosecond, we get the full name before it becomes a cryptic T or FLA&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186710?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:01:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c18c5988-8777-4686-a491-010fec80e78c</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Todd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;robloxley&amp;quot;]Another snarky comment![/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, for once justified I think although, as usual, he doesn&amp;#39;t gild the lily.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What should it be called, seeing someone is so unhappy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186686?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:16dd1b26-7186-400f-b836-9d093576f8c2</guid><dc:creator>Martin Atkinson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Martin Atkinson&amp;quot;]I have had a similar problem in a cat with the solitary lesion immediately caudal to the 309 molar. [/quote]Just had this cat in today and extracted the 208 carnassial and 209 peg molar. We&amp;#39;ll see how it gets on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A great example of Vetsurgeon.org in action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186659?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:14:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ce63874a-040d-4751-8b43-bd1bebcf8613</guid><dc:creator>Matt Hilary</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for the assistance. I&amp;#39;ll try to post a follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186450?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:50:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a7b44554-0004-492f-ad4c-fceeeb9cdd89</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;David Mills&amp;quot;]It&amp;#39;s not a personal criticism but it seems, well, odd for an independent mind, professional etc etc&amp;nbsp;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another snarky comment!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186426?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 22:20:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9a41d504-55da-45ec-b0ee-e32995402214</guid><dc:creator>David Mills</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Lou Dawson&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;David Mills&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this acceptable then?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you mean the terminology? Well, I use the published term so that vets receiving my reports can go and search the literature for more information if they want to. Should the lesion have been given that name in the first place?No.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So why perpetuate something that is inaccurate? See the thread on pyometra. It&amp;#39;s not a personal criticism but it seems, well, odd for an independent mind, professional etc etc&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186421?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:80e40c4b-a99e-47f4-80a3-f7f6d6085d77</guid><dc:creator>Lou Dawson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;David Mills&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this acceptable then?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you mean the terminology? Well, I use the published term so that vets receiving my reports can go and search the literature for more information if they want to. Should the lesion have been given that name in the first place?No.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186418?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:14:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:458d08ff-69c2-42ad-bdbb-b5a88121ecd4</guid><dc:creator>David Mills</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Lou Dawson&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Evelyn Barbour-Hill&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Histopathology always comes back as &amp;quot;inflammatory&amp;quot; (together with the pathologist&amp;#39;s pet name for the syndrome). The nature of the inflammation in my opinion is irrelevant, the point is to rule out neoplasia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;very true! My current pet name for these is &amp;#39;feline oral pyogenic granuloma&amp;#39; which is a complete misnomer as these are neither purulent nor a true granuloma, but it&amp;#39;s what they&amp;#39;re called in a paper I reference (Riehl et al 2014 Journal of Veterinary Dentistry).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this acceptable then?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186417?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 20:26:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:726f13dd-6f5a-435a-99a8-b6b8c84f7efd</guid><dc:creator>Lou Dawson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote user=&amp;quot;Evelyn Barbour-Hill&amp;quot;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Histopathology always comes back as &amp;quot;inflammatory&amp;quot; (together with the pathologist&amp;#39;s pet name for the syndrome). The nature of the inflammation in my opinion is irrelevant, the point is to rule out neoplasia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;very true! My current pet name for these is &amp;#39;feline oral pyogenic granuloma&amp;#39; which is a complete misnomer as these are neither purulent nor a true granuloma, but it&amp;#39;s what they&amp;#39;re called in a paper I reference (Riehl et al 2014 Journal of Veterinary Dentistry).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186411?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:52:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c3b40ea9-be8a-4f38-a8c0-155c07a29506</guid><dc:creator>Evelyn Barbour-Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;(I hate that term &amp;quot;gum chewer syndrome&amp;quot;. Hate it. American invention. Stupid, stupid. &lt;img src="/emoticons/v2/Angry_smiley.png" alt="Angry" /&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cut it off. That may be curative. If it recurs, cut it off and extract the lower 9 &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; the upper 8. If you can only extract one tooth, make it the upper 8. The occlusion may be subtly traumatic in normal life even though it looks fine on examination, even under GA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I note there is significant inflammation by the furcation of 408 in that photograph, by the way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Histopathology always comes back as &amp;quot;inflammatory&amp;quot; (together with the pathologist&amp;#39;s pet name for the syndrome). The nature of the inflammation in my opinion is irrelevant, the point is to rule out neoplasia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Feline Caudal Buccal Granulomas</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/186404?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:49:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:572317d2-9a54-484c-919a-f0511a36baa2</guid><dc:creator>Martin Atkinson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have had a similar problem in a cat with the solitary lesion immediately caudal to the 309 molar. This was extracted successfully with all the roots and the lesion excised as widely as possible with electrosurgery. As I would have expected tt healed uneventfully and was clear at post op check after a couple of weeks but had recurred 12 months later a few weeks ago at the annual health check. It was excised again as widely as I could without causing significant collateral damage but has recurred in&amp;nbsp;3 weeks. Both times the histopath has come back as inflammatory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Presently on antibiotics as it looked a bit pussy and anti-inflammatory dose of preds to be re-examined in week or so,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d be interested to here how your case gets on or for other opinions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>