<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>MCT and Palladia</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/24229/mct-and-palladia</link><description> Greeting, some opinions and experiences would be appreciated. 
 I have a patient who I recently removed a patnaik grade 2 or kiupel low grade mast cell tumour from her shoulder (cutaneous) with a good &amp;gt;1cm margins all sides and deep. this is the 2nd</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: MCT and Palladia</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/157531?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 22:30:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:122644ad-8f9d-40b2-8e02-6e0ae9da4095</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Saul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tony,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect that Braden is totally right and this is a de novo tumour; I also suspect he&amp;#39;s right in that adjunctive therapy won&amp;#39;t be needed in this case but to be&amp;nbsp;sure however I would want to know a little more information:-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- what is the mitotic index (you can find this by looking at the histo report; it is the number of mitotic figures per 10 high powered fields)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- I would suggest staging with survey imaging and FNAs of the local lymph nodes (you may need to do this under ultrasound guidance), liver and spleen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- If cost is not a major restriction then Ki67 may be useful (It is particularly useful when the mitotic index is in the &amp;#39;grey zone&amp;#39; of 2-5 ish) as this is independent of histological grade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should the mitotic index be low (0,1,2), the staging not reveal any evidence for metastasis and the Ki67 (if performed) be low then adjunctive therapy will not be indicated; just what I term passive aggressive monitoring would be suitable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If mitotic index is high (certainly &amp;gt;5 but also if it is less than 5 but with a high Ki67) or if there is documented metastasis then adjunctive treatment would be indicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the choice of adjunctive therapy, the jury&amp;#39;s still out regarding the choice between TKIs and conventional cytotoxic (vinblastine/CCNU).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards which TKI, my own preference this case would be Masivet over Palladia. Masivet is narrower spectrum and generally better tolerated. I generally don&amp;#39;t like Palladia for MCTs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a few thoughts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hope this helps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: MCT and Palladia</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/157518?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 10:40:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:cc2b2d50-5aae-4b54-aeb3-b158dcb57ef5</guid><dc:creator>Braden Collins</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Each of those tumours is a new tumour, and if you&amp;#39;ve got cleam margins on a low grade tumour I don&amp;#39;t think you need to worry about recurrence or spread.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&amp;#39;t use palladia at this point as I don&amp;#39;t know of any evidence of it preventing new tumours, and I think the risks far outweigh any benefits. I would just encourage the owner to check the dog weekly and represent straight away if any lumps found.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>