<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Another anal sac mass</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/23980/another-anal-sac-mass</link><description> Another one for 
 8 year old castrated Cocker Spaniel, presented with sore eye. Anal sac mass noticed during examination, bloods show mild hypercalcaemia. CT scan with contrast performed and the report can be seen here . 
 It is a colleague&amp;#39;s case, and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Another anal sac mass</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/154510?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:12:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:dce80cd6-74bb-4b30-9e72-6cb821fcfe39</guid><dc:creator>Rob Davis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks (again!) Gerry, I will pass this on to my colleague.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Another anal sac mass</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/154419?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:59:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:65342be1-d669-46cd-b7f5-f732967e7783</guid><dc:creator>Gerry Polton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rob&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a very big primary tumour so that is going to be your primary problem here. I agree that the lymph node is metastatic and that the splenic changes are very unlikely to be metastases. However, it would be wrong to undertake surgery without first demonstrating that the splenic changes are indeed benign. Likely success and costs of surgery at your hospital are things I am unable to comment upon. However, if this case presented to me I would be likely to recommend surgery with serial re-evaluations on a quarterly basis thereafter. I would expect further lymph node metastasis to develop within twelve months of surgery. I would expect hypercalcaemia to resolve in response to surgery if that was a real observation in the first place. Please note that hypercalcaemia increases the risk of death during and immediately (3d) after surgery due to alterations in tissue perfusion and coagulopathy effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best wishes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gerry&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>