<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/clinical-questions/2327/neutering-of-bitches-with-delayed-first-season</link><description> A case recently brought up a few questions regarding bitches
which are delayed in having their first season. How old are they before you do something &amp;amp; what is it
you do? (spay regardless, blood tests etc..) To an extent this will be affected by size</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/4168?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:42:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e2741922-6bb3-46b0-94ea-fa5da3182317</guid><dc:creator>Mark Frost</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that comes from being a Bristol grad under Professor Holt, as far as I am aware no studies back it up yet (but may have missed something in the last few years).&amp;nbsp; Its practice policy here but potentially needs discussing...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/4154?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:03:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:8d5d7e44-dc3b-4191-902b-86e7631fae1b</guid><dc:creator>beldather</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m interested in the statement of spaying after the first heat to reduce incontinence.&lt;br /&gt;I have always been taught that you will actually get a reduction in UI by spaying prior to first heat as well as significant reduction in mammary tumours. The incontinence does however tend to be worse if it does&amp;nbsp;occur. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Always happy to change my mind though if the evidence is there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blair&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/3829?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c884855e-eb3e-4213-8c2f-3ef91d1e78af</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Castle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Adult vulva and mammary development certainly suggests there has been some sort of season. I tell owners it&amp;#39;s a &amp;quot;silent heat&amp;quot; and are happy to spay as long as there are no obvious signs of false pregnancy present. We too wait 3 months after season before spaying. &amp;nbsp;A progesterone assay would rule this in or out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/3816?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:29:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:9c47920f-a580-4622-a894-02f396cb79a6</guid><dc:creator>ms1083</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would say that so long as she is not in season on the day of the op would do it anyway. If she has not had a season shurely the only problem would be slightly increased risk of incontinence later in life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a practice we do them 3m after first season so they benefit of the season for the bladder sphincter but still have benefit regarding reduced mammary tumour development. The ones I have done before their first season are simple as the tract is tiny.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Neutering of bitches with delayed first season</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/thread/3807?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:11:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:caaaa792-05b3-45b1-9526-e453847e0e13</guid><dc:creator>Evelyn Barbour-Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Missing small premolars are very common so I don&amp;#39;t think that tells you anything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What increased risk exactly is it the owners are worried about?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>