/b/veterinary-news/posts/89491 The RCVS DC has directed that a Wirral-based veterinary surgeon should be removed from the Register after finding that he had treated clients badly, kept inadequate clinical records, was dishonest in dealing with the RCVS, and that animals in hisen-USTelligent Community 10https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/89491Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:13:47 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:48489919-e111-47c3-9675-25aa9e89fe8cferritin and ferreting0<p>Surely Robin Grimmer misses the point its not the sole practitioner factor but the approach to communication and interaction with the owner that appears to be palpably lacking</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=89491&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/89491Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:38:13 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:48489919-e111-47c3-9675-25aa9e89fe8cRobin Grimmer0<p>Good result. There seems to be a few of these vets about. Usually sole practitioners, with woeful facilities and care and are clinically incompetent. They tar the profession with a bad name.</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=89491&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">