<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DC severely reprimands London vet for failings in care</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/84991</link><description> The RCVS Disciplinary Committee has severely reprimanded and warned
as to his future conduct a veterinary surgeon who failed to make sufficient
enquiries about the location or condition of a cat; unreasonably refused to
provide it with first aid and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: DC severely reprimands London vet for failings in care</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/84991</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:50:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ec2c7d98-17d1-4188-94c4-f329d2cef3f0</guid><dc:creator>George Packer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems harsh in the circumstances described. It should be reasonable for private out of hours providers to divert callers to charitable concerns who receive funding for animal welfare where there is real concern about the ability of the client to pay. It is in no-one&amp;#39;s interest for a client to run up an unaffordable bill, least of all the client.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=84991&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>