<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Evidence-based medicine hampered by lack of quality research</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/73247</link><description> The RCVS Charitable Trust has released the results of a survey that suggests a lack of available, high-quality research could be hampering the implementation of evidence-based medicine (EVM) in veterinary practice. 
 Of the 70 survey
respondents, although</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Evidence-based medicine hampered by lack of quality research</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/73247</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:08:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:ff081456-407c-41a5-abe0-a568b6a8e56a</guid><dc:creator>james herriot lied</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me, or is there an irony in presenting the largely anecdotal opinions of 0.3% of the profession as a representative statement of the profession&amp;#39;s adherence to evidence based medicine?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plural of anecdote? Not evidence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=73247&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>