<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><description> The RCVS Disciplinary Committee has agreed to adjourn
multiple charges against a Hampshire-based veterinary surgeon who first
registered in 1950, following his undertakings firstly to request removal from
the RCVS Register and secondly never apply</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:57:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Evelyn Barbour-Hill</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Innocent till proved guilty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A man already retired sees little purpose in spending lots of money fighting charges he denies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:50:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>james herriot lied</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;It makes for alarming reading, certainly. But I&amp;#39;d point out that the colleague in question denies the charges, and has not at this point had any proven. It&amp;#39;s therefore not reasonable for the rest of us to decide on his guilt - we all pay our subs for the privilege of being put before the DC after all, and who buys a horse, only to pull the cart themself?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Were he to be found guilty of certain of the charges, I&amp;#39;d be the first to throw stones - or rather, second after Wynne - but until that point is reached, speculation and gossip are unprofessional. Hence the suggestion to rephrase: a discussion of the charge sheet is one thing; assumption of guilt quite another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:22:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Gillian Mostyn</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you read the charge sheet JHL? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://awardingbody.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/cartmell-william-bamber-september-2012-charges/"&gt;awardingbody.rcvs.org.uk/.../cartmell-william-bamber-september-2012-charges&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once it gets to this stage it is unlikely that the charges are completely incorrect - they are very thoroughly investigated before this stage. &amp;nbsp;It would be difficult to defend these actions really. &amp;nbsp;He may feel he is not guilty of disgraceful conduct, but I think few would agree with him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:45:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>james herriot lied</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;So a man at the end of his career decides that he no longer has the will to fight charges which he denies, and instead leaves a profession which he has served - with an unblemished record - for sixty years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Presuming his guilt is unwarranted. We should have more respect both for our colleagues and for the abiding principle of &amp;#39;innocent till proven guilty&amp;#39;. Suggesting guilt without knowledge of the case is pretty much the textbook definition of a disparaging remark - which is surely unprofessional according to the GtoPC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would it be too much to ask for a rephrasing and associated apology, Wynne?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:41:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;In that case fine-though I think the risk of injury to working spaniels is exaggerated so would personally refuse to dock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:31:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>jd2008</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, I&amp;#39;m aware of that. She had actually left one of the litter undocked for me as she knew I didn&amp;#39;t want it docked and would only be going so far as field trials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:11:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Unless &amp;nbsp;you work it, if it&amp;#39;s docked then the breeder was breaking the law in selling it to you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:59:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>jd2008</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;William Cartmell is the vet the breeder of my Springer recommends on her website (he docks) :-(&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:03:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I downloaded the charge sheet and it&amp;#39;s horrendous, but I agree that Royal College were sensible in saving us the cost of a hearing estimated to last 4 weeks, and he&amp;#39;s off the Register so the main objective was achieved&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS I didn&amp;#39;t know you could get Immobilon now&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:55:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Tim Cheyne</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Or more likely the RCVS made a sensible suggestion to which he agreed; a rather nicer way of putting it. &amp;nbsp;The name rings a vague bell in my deteriorating memory; I think that at one time he was a very respected member of the profession.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RCVS Disciplinary Committee adjourns charges against Hampshire vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/71506</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:a9d06e14-6339-4984-8acd-d8776f93335e</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wynne Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like he jumped before he could be pushed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wynne&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=71506&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>