/b/veterinary-news/posts/30638 The RCVS Disciplinary Committee has this week directed that the name of a Grimsby veterinary surgeon should be removed from the RCVS Register, having found him guilty of serious professional misconduct for advising and undertaking surgical proceduresen-USTelligent Community 10https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/30638Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:00:16 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:dad1b878-0b3b-42c1-9940-c3fa6191900cAnonymous0<p>It&#39;s correct to defend your actions when you believe them to have been correct and in the best interests of client and patient.</p> <p>When it is clear that your actions were not, to continue to defend yourself nonetheless shows a lack of insight, a lack of appreciation of what you may have done better, and therefore no guarantee that you could do things differently in future - which by definition gives the DC a very straightforward case.</p> <p>It may help to think of any normal court - where someone commits a crime but is unapologetic and tries to defend themselves in the face of overwhelming evidence, they simply come out looking worse.</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=30638&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/30638Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:19:43 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:dad1b878-0b3b-42c1-9940-c3fa6191900cEvelyn Barbour-Hill0<p>&quot;his every action was vigorously defended&quot;... is that not right and proper? How does it make his offence worse?</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=30638&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">