/b/veterinary-news/posts/21966 Medivet has reported a wide range of public reaction to the recent Panorama programme &#39;It shouldn&#39;t happen at a vets&#39;, most of which has been at one extreme or the other. On the one hand, says the company, many clients have gone out of their way toen-USTelligent Community 10https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/21966Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:51:51 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c810062d-b070-45f3-8077-00a09c031716Pieter Fourie0<p>How many of the incidents shown over a 9 mths period were to the actual detriment of either the patient or the client?</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=21966&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/21966Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:24:49 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c810062d-b070-45f3-8077-00a09c031716David Rudman0<p>So was there a nett effect on turnover for Medivet? I&#39;m sure they know. It would be interesting to know.</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=21966&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/21966Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:40:20 GMT146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c810062d-b070-45f3-8077-00a09c031716plantagenet0<p>I have noticed that clients seem more likely to comment (unfavourably) on the size of bills since Panorama. &nbsp;I have also noticed that my small number of bad debtors seem to have a justification for their non payment. One client claimed that I had &quot;added stupid things&quot; to the bill - a bitch caesar after a planned mating - one wonders what was unecessary, the GA?! This may all be paranoia on my part, but I do detect a &#39;Panorama Effect&#39;.</p> <img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=21966&AppID=5&AppType=Weblog&ContentType=0" width="1" height="1">