Vets begin strike action at South Wales practice

RE: Vets begin strike action at South Wales practice

podenka — Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:11:34 GMT

No Arlo, it was judged by amount of lines in the article given to each of sides. Calling BVU’s statements ‚allegations’ also makes it clear that you ARE taking a side, just stop saying that it is balanced. Obviously you do not realise how biased you are - and fair enough, you don’t have to be unbiased.

RE: Vets begin strike action at South Wales practice

Arlo Guthrie — Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:45:17 GMT

[mention:fc778d3cc867494e81dcf7bfde40199a:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] I don’t have to be balanced either, certainly no more balanced than the left wing Guardian or the right wing Telegraph. But as it happens, I think I was completely balanced. I certainly don’t have any reason to support either side in this dispute. I simply took the allegations made to me by the BVU and asked VetPartners to respond to them, and reported its response. I am at a loss to understand why you think that was biased. Is it that you would only think an article is balanced if it leans heavily towards the ‘evil, money-grabbing corporate’ narrative?

RE: Vets begin strike action at South Wales practice

podenka — Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:45:05 GMT

Just to add a bit more balanced view please have look at this news from The Guardian www.theguardian.com/.../vets-extend-strike-in-first-industrial-action-to-hit-britains-pet-care-sector

RE: Vets begin strike action at South Wales practice

podenka — Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:43:03 GMT

I do not feel this is balanced post. Much more voice is given to the corporate than to BVU and I know that BVU has passed to Arlo much more information than mentioned. This is a historical action, strike always a last choice.