<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The remote prescription debate that could redefine what it means to be a vet</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/remote-prescription-could-redefine-what-it-means-to-be-a-vet</link><description> A motion to conduct a trial of remote prescribing without performing a physical examination (ie. via telemedicine), thereby redefining what it means for an animal to be &amp;quot;under the care&amp;quot; of a veterinary surgeon, was put before RCVS Council last week.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: The remote prescription debate that could redefine what it means to be a vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/remote-prescription-could-redefine-what-it-means-to-be-a-vet</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 09:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e393f5ba-f61e-4f07-acc3-550522603d09</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you both, [mention:6dbfd6ebb1734244b6f5ff3e994aa463:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] &amp;nbsp;and [mention:cd2e405987924a86863edf3b05ea46a4:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=140942&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: The remote prescription debate that could redefine what it means to be a vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/remote-prescription-could-redefine-what-it-means-to-be-a-vet</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:39:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e393f5ba-f61e-4f07-acc3-550522603d09</guid><dc:creator>Robert FalconerTaylor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Brillaint and worth sharing with the pet-owning general public&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=140942&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: The remote prescription debate that could redefine what it means to be a vet</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/remote-prescription-could-redefine-what-it-means-to-be-a-vet</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:03:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e393f5ba-f61e-4f07-acc3-550522603d09</guid><dc:creator>Clare Tapsfield-Wright</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent Arlo , thank you . It is reassuring to hear the same concerns raised at council as are held by many practitioners. It does emphasise to me how important it is to have practitioners on council. I’m not sure some of the lay members sound aware of the ramifications of the proposals &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=140942&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>