<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vets vote against the corporatisation of equine practice</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/vets-vote-against-the-corporatisation-of-equine-practice</link><description> The British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA) reports that at the end of a hotly contested Moral Maze style debate held at Congress last week, only 28% of the 329 delegates agreed with the motion: Corporatisation is inevitable and will benefit vets</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Vets vote against the corporatisation of equine practice</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/vets-vote-against-the-corporatisation-of-equine-practice</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 20:03:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e1e0273b-ea74-45ac-83f3-272a79f9fb0d</guid><dc:creator>Shazzarazza</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Having been in that session roblxley, yes you are correct - and there were comments made during the session to that end. Unfortunately due to the nature of the set up of the automatic voting system i don&amp;#39;t think they could separate out the questions ... result no one really knew which bit they were agreeing with... so maybe not so telling a &amp;quot;vote&amp;quot; ...I hope that we were saying that we don&amp;#39;t believe that corporitisation is inevitable, and so there will remain good opportunity for both good independants and likewise good corporates, but where the corporates do take on practices that it will benefit vets and their clients. e.g. 4 day working weeks with no &amp;quot;long haul&amp;quot; weekends from Friday morning through Monday nights has got to mean vets are less tired &amp;amp; hopefully less stressed , which in turn means vets are in a better place to offer a great standard of service to their clients. We might be able to offer more client evenings/ training/ attendance at events for the clients and even take some more time for CPD for ourselves &amp;nbsp;if we&amp;#39;re not so sleep deprived / working all the hours! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=140490&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Vets vote against the corporatisation of equine practice</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/vets-vote-against-the-corporatisation-of-equine-practice</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:49:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e1e0273b-ea74-45ac-83f3-272a79f9fb0d</guid><dc:creator>Rob Loxley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Corporatisation is inevitable and will benefit vets and their clients&amp;quot; - aren&amp;#39;t those three separate statements (enevitable, benefit vets, benefit clients) that have been conflated together?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=140490&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>