RE: RCVS Knowledge unveils new EBVM resource

Tom Lonsdale — Sun, 06 Mar 2016 02:15:30 GMT

'reflection, analysis and improvement'

What a joke!

No reflection, no analysis, no improvement to the bogus system currently masquerading as vet 'science'.

At core there's the unshakeable assumption that domestic carnivores can be fed from the can and packet with no short or long term health impairment.

Next there's the absurd assumption that the can and packet contains superior fare to the wild natural reference diet.

Then there's the massive fraud that brand name Hill's, Iams, Royal Canin are superior to all other junk.

Then there's the vicious assumption that not only is junk superior, but that the natural standard is in fact 'harmful'.

Of course since junk food appears at every twist and turn in the vet orthodoxy, ipso facto, at every turn the vet 'science' is bogus.

To make matters worse, there's a stoopid assumption that the vet reductionist methodology allows vets to identify, diagnose and treat ill health. A further set of stooopid assumptions leads practitioners to believe the information derived from blunt instruments -- stethoscopes, xray machines, thermometers, etc -- can yield useful information. (At the end stage they may.)

Bah humbug. Wot's before your eyes, up your nose and at your fingertips tells infinitely more than all the bogus vet guff piled high.

Stop the junk food, pull the bad teeth, fix the obesity and watch the pets become 'like kittens/puppies' again.

What do the ridiculous deckchair attendants have to say about that, I wonder?