<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Specialist, specialise, specialised, specialising, specialisation, speciality</title><link>/b/veterinary-news/posts/139323</link><description> The RCVS has announced that the Code of Professional Conduct has been updated to restrict - from April 2016 - the use of the word specialist and its derivatives in veterinary practice marketing and promotional materials, except when referring to an RCVS</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Specialist, specialise, specialised, specialising, specialisation, speciality</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/139323</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:34:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:e7a08bb2-a444-400b-b62c-3802753bbed2</guid><dc:creator>Aine Seavers</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent info, many thanks.Sounds like it is well overdue. I am not a specialist but suspect &amp;nbsp;it must be quite galling for those who sat the exams and did the slog to then have others simply self-award the term as applied to their own level of knowledge, I have &amp;nbsp;also seen vets claim &amp;#39;publication&amp;#39; status simply &amp;nbsp;by writing letters to the editor- also galling given the quantum difference in writing a letter and writing a scientific paper or even a clinical paper but the public knows no better and are thus fooled in their vet practitioner selection,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/aggbug?PostID=139323&amp;AppID=5&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>