Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

grumpyoldman — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:34:14 GMT

Just using the welfare issue was enough , you do worry a little about the way they ruminated over the minutae of it all after its been dealt with by the courts. It does seem that the great and good love a good rummage in other peoples dirty linen, and the more soiled the better.

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

Stefano Susanna — Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:00:28 GMT

Is there anything to say???!!!

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

Liz Ormerod — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 15:12:31 GMT

It has been demonstrated that some people who wish to abuse animals seek jobs in which they will have access to them. This is a similar situation to child abusers who seek out opportunities where they will have easy access.

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

mark bridge — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:05:07 GMT

Wow. Kind of like someone with a foot fetish working in a shoe store.

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

Hannah Wynne Richards — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:30:55 GMT

He's definitely some-one who's best NOT on the register.

Wynne

RE: Suffolk vet struck off for bestiality

James Laidlaw — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:29:31 GMT

Am I reading this right when I think it sounds like they registered him AFTER he was charged with bestiality, in order to strike him off the register???