<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Small Animal Medicine Society</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: IMTP treatment when I can't use prednisolone. Refractory to MMF and ciclosporin - opinions please</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31392/imtp-treatment-when-i-can-t-use-prednisolone-refractory-to-mmf-and-ciclosporin---opinions-please/249129#249129</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:91ab69fd-889b-4db5-b824-ebf955b0bb61</guid><dc:creator>Kit Sturgess</dc:creator><description>Hi Giulia Tough case - the diagnostician in me would ask how comfortable you are that this is still an unassociated IMTP case - is there any possibility that this is secondary to another cause hence the poor response - in a 13yo SBT I would have to have paraneoplastic syndrome on the list. I think it is really tough to treat some of these cases without prednisolone. Ciclosporin absorption is very variable between patients so it may be that the dose is sub therapeutic - for some immune mediated disease doses as high as 10mg/kg q12hr have been used but monitoring is advised. I personally have had limited observable benefits from leflunomide when I have used it other than in some low grade immune mediated disease cases such as polymyositis. Despite its slow onset of action, given although low, this patients platelet count is stable I would consider azathioprine. Personally I would try and discuss prednsiolone again - what were the side effects and were they dose dependent, could you use methylprednisolone? Splenectomy would also be on my list depending on surgical facilities, access to fresh whole blood etc. Hope that helps All the best Kit</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Pyogranulomatous Lymphadenopathy in 18week old kitten</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31393/pyogranulomatous-lymphadenopathy-in-18week-old-kitten</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4bfff289-9668-4bd6-9770-68a3d73c164f</guid><dc:creator>Stuart Black</dc:creator><description>Hello, A little stumped with this one. Have a 18week old MN kitten in from a reacue situation. One of 5 from the litter. I have not seen any of the other litter One was PTS due to increasing dyspnoea and multiple cutaneous nodules. 2 kittens have corneal oedema and vague neurological signs (mainly ataxia) 1 kitten apparently is bow legged and is very ill thrifty This kitten is bright, eating and growing well but has this very large unilateral lymphadenitis (histo report below). Felv/fiv negative, bloods otherwise normal (mildly high globulins). Abdominal and thoracic ultrasound is normal (no abdominal lymphadenopathy). They have started GS-441524 presuming FIP but I think this would be less likely? None of the kittens have responded favourably after 1 week. We are potentially going to request PCR on the biopsy for mycobacteria. Poor response to amox/clav as well as nsaids. I was struggling really with a robust differential list and worried about potential zoonotic infections. i have advised them to isolate the kittens from other animals for now pending advice. Any advice would be very much appreciated! INCISIONAL Clinical History: Recurrent abscess type lesions on two kittens from the same litter, previous culture on other kitten did not isolate any growth. Pathology Report PRELIMINARY INTERPRETATION: Tissue from ventral neck: Pyogranulomatous and plasmacytic inflammation with prominent granulation tissue formation, oedema, haemorrhage and intralesional bacteria Pending special stains COMMENTS: The samples in Bumble&amp;#39;s neck show pyogranulomatous and plasmacytic inflammation with intralesional bacteria, which suggests underlying bacterial infection and agrees with the culture results. Special stains have been requested to try to correlate these findings with the microbiology results. An addendum will follow shortly. My colleague Dr. Thomas Eley was consulted on this case for additional perspective and agrees with this interpretation. HISTOPATHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION: Tissue from the ventral neck (per body map): This tissue is entirely comprised by densely cellular aggregates of neutrophils, macrophages, plasma cells and fewer lymphocytes in a background of collagenous matrix with numerous capillaries lined by plump endothelium and hyperchromatic fibroblasts (granulation tissue). The granulation tissue is extensively expanded by oedema and multifocal haemorrhage. Occasionally, intralesional dense colonies of bacteria and foreign material are observed. PATHOLOGIST: Mafalda Casa Nova, DVM, DVSc, Dipl. ACVP</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: IMTP treatment when I can't use prednisolone. Refractory to MMF and ciclosporin - opinions please</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31392/imtp-treatment-when-i-can-t-use-prednisolone-refractory-to-mmf-and-ciclosporin---opinions-please</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:b5eb6235-b25a-4203-af04-ee5a4cf60f5a</guid><dc:creator>Giulia Grenga</dc:creator><description>Opinions please. 13 year old FN Staffie. First diagnosed with IMTP in December 2025. Abdominal ultrasound showed heterogenous round splenic mass 2.6 cm x 2.92 cm (seen previously Oct 2024) and enlarged L adrenal 1.19 cm. Went into remission on prednisolone however had severe adverse effects so preds tapered and stopped in April 2026. Patient has relapsed in June 2026 (PLT 20 x 10’9, 140-700). Abdominal imaging static. Endocrine testing not supportive of hyperadrenocorticism. O refusing preds as concerned about how unwell dog was. IV vincristine given then mycophenolate started at 9.9 mg/kg BID beginning of June. No response thus far. Added in ciclosporin 5mg/kg BID start of July. Still no change in PLT count 14 x10^9/L (140 –700). Owner still declining steroids and wanting different drug. Limited to no literature about immunosuppressive drugs that don’t include pred for IMTP. I was debating stopping mycophenolate and adding leflunomide to ciclosporin. Opinions? Thanks!</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Urinary incontinence in male dog</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31292/urinary-incontinence-in-male-dog/249125#249125</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:5b8ae233-b1d4-4a1a-91af-8ba8c3dc968f</guid><dc:creator>Holly Lee</dc:creator><description>Just an update: CT was consistent with ectopic ureter. At surgery both his ureters exited the same place within the bladder but close to sphincter and with a trough of tissue directing urine out of the bladder. Surgery corrected these but 3 weeks post surgery he has more typical USMI signs with more leaking when lying down/full bladder so currently trialling propalin and next step if that fails we&amp;#39;ll try testosterone! Just wanted to give a update to say thanks again for the input! Holly</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Young cat with ileal thickening &amp; chronic D+</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31390/young-cat-with-ileal-thickening-chronic-d</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:757fdb5e-266f-43f7-af6d-c3d7325523c7</guid><dc:creator>Holly Lee</dc:creator><description>Hi all, Any opinions welcomed on this case that I am struggling with.. Ludo is a 1yo ragdoll x BSH MN cat who has at least 6m history of waxing and waning diarrhoea, some prior vomiting, weight loss and currently severe tenesmus and discomfort defaecating. He had giardia diagnosed at one stage and treated with metronidazole (before I saw him) and has had various gastro diets and probiotics since then. On ultrasound he had a severely thickened area of bowel wall in the distal ileum and enlargement of jejunal and sublumbar lymph nodes. 2 lots of cytology on lymph nodes have been reactive, PCR for coronavirus negative, FNA of bowel wall first one was non diagnostic, 2nd has shown neutrophilic inflammation (possible bacteria, possible contamination) - I&amp;#39;ll copy report at bottom of post. Prior to the last repeat ultrasound and FNAs we had trialled prednisolone for a suspicion of IBD after a risk-benefit discussion with O and electing not to biopsy at this stage; there was no response. Given the neutrophilic inflammation I am wondering if there is some bowel wall infection and we need antibiotics but short of biopsy for histopathology and culture I feel like I am stabbing in the dark. I am reluctant to pursue full thickness biopsy at the moment given the risk of poor healing of an abnormal bowel wall, but we are not making progress and this kitty is having a bad time. Any thoughts welcomed, even if it&amp;#39;s that we can&amp;#39;t progress without biopsy! Thanks Holly Cytology report: SITES: 1. Ileocecal colic lymph node: Four slides are received. 2. Ileum: Four slides are received. INTERPRETATION: 1. Ileocecal colic lymph node: Consistent with reactive lymph node 2. Ileum: Evidence of enterocentesis, septic neutrophilic inflammation COMMENTS: 1. Ileocecal colic lymph node: The mixed lymphoid population with scattered plasma cells and histiocytes is consistent with reactive/immune stimulated lymph node, most likely due to immune stimulation from the GI tract. There is no convincing evidence of primary lymphadenitis to suggest FIP, however lesions may be focal and the possibility of a non-representative sample cannot be excluded. 2. Ileum: There is apparent enterocentesis with collection of intestinal content explaining the large number Report Continued .... Page 1 of 2 Case Number: H26019438 CYTOLOGY Submitter: DR HOLLY LEE Owner: HARVEY-JOHANSEN of mixed bacteria, however there is also evidence of a significant neutrophilic inflammatory reaction associated with bacteria. This may reflect neutrophilic enteritis, or possibly an intestinal abscess. Correlation with clinical signs and ultrasonographic appearance of the area is recommended. CYTOPATHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION: 1. Ileocecal colic lymph node: These slides have areas of moderate to high cellularity with good to thick preparation and good cell preservation. There is moderate blood contamination and a pale pink to blue background containing numerous cytoplasmic droplets. The lymphoid population is composed of at least 75% small mature lymphocytes with a patchy increase in intermediate lymphocytes and low numbers of large lymphocytes. There are also scattered plasma cells and occasional histiocytes with no convincing evidence of lymphadenitis. Atypical cells are not observed. 2. Ileum: These preparations contain a thick background of abundant mixed bacteria (predominantly variably-sized bacilli) intermingled with mucoid debris and low numbers of RBCs. In most areas cellular preservation is poor, however there are some large clusters of markedly degenerate neutrophils with intracellular bacteria noted. Scattered fragments of variably sized and coloured material in the background appear consistent with intestinal content, with some recognisable fragments of hair shafts and plant material.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Faecal Calprotectin Testing</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31379/faecal-calprotectin-testing</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:bbd0ec21-70f6-4249-afe9-43c3e13292e6</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Bleakley</dc:creator><description>Hi all, I have just had a rep talking about faecal Calprotectin and wondered if anyone had any experience using the test or if anyone had big issues with it. It seems more of a use in monitoring cases than anything else but wondered what cases it differentiates between compared to clinical signs. Thanks for any input, Josh</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/249011#249011</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:5dd3fbb6-3142-40fc-8c0c-ef879b31fd78</guid><dc:creator>Katherine Clarke</dc:creator><description>HI Steve, Your questions are, as always, good ones and we don&amp;#39;t yet have the answers to them. There does seem to be more veterinary professionals testing positive in the UK than was initially expected and we don&amp;#39;t yet understand why. I hope to start working with one of the consultants who treat people with B. canis (thanks to your colleague for putting me in touch) to try and get answers to this. Chatting to vets that work in the US, people intermittently get infected with B. canis but because it is endemic out there (and because maybe their approach to antibiotic stewardship is, umm, different to ours), they will just treat it like any other infectious disease. Some dogs respond very well clinically and become seronegative (although can later become seropositive), while others just remain clinical and seropositive. We are testing dogs that have not travelled that have signs that could be consistent with brucellosis such as discospondylitis, IMPA, reproductive failure etc. because it is impossible to be certain that they have not been exposed to brucella in the UK. It is a rapidly changing and evolving situation and we just have to try and adjust what we are doing as we gain more information! Katherine</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Aspergillus treatment</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31376/aspergillus-treatment/249010#249010</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:c34cde36-5a48-410f-b437-ed96b2cf0576</guid><dc:creator>Jon Camilleri</dc:creator><description>Hi Pauline Thank you for the reply. Apologies, I have been away. I treated the one side this time (hadn&amp;#39;t seen your reply). Plan to re-evaluate in a few weeks so option to treat both then Regards Jon</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Do you find diagnosis and treatment of liver disease in dogs and cats frustrating? Do you want to see more clinically relevant studies of liver disease in small animals to help us understand causes, treatment efficacy and prognosis better? If so, then the</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31378/do-you-find-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-liver-disease-in-dogs-and-cats-frustrating-do-you-want-to-see-more-clinically-relevant-studies-of-liver-disease-in-small-animals-to-help-us-understand-causes-treatment-efficacy-and-progn</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:409e2ba1-9947-4cee-a3bb-7c15f922dbc6</guid><dc:creator>Penny Watson</dc:creator><description>Hello everyone Forgive me for the advert but I wanted to make everyone aware of the opportunity to come to our ECVIM pre congress - you don&amp;#39;t have to be a specialist to come and we would really like input from motivated first opinion practitioners. Details below Do you find diagnosis and treatment of liver disease in dogs and cats frustrating? Do you want to see more clinically relevant studies of liver disease in small animals to help us understand causes, treatment efficacy and prognosis better? If so, then the Society of Comparative Hepatology (SCH) would like your help! We are dedicating our ECVIM pre congress meeting on 9th September 2026 in Berlin to identifying the most clinically important knowledge gaps in small animal hepatology and how we can address them with studies in both first opinion and referral practices. Your contribution would be greatly appreciated: 1) Have a look at the list of unanswered questions below and tell us if you have any additional questions about canine and feline liver disease that you have always wanted answered 2) Consider coming to our pre ECVIM pre congress in Berlin: this is open to all vets with an interest in liver disease - you don’t have to be a specialist - and you can attend either in person or on-line. Details are here and note that you can join the SCH for 3 years for €60 which is the difference between the non-member and member fees SCH Precongress Day ecvimcongress.org We have an exciting programme ahead including lectures from Andrea Johnston Associate Professor of Small Animal Internal Medicine and Pathobiology from Michigan State who will consider the unanswered questions in veterinary hepatology; Dr Dan O’Neill, Professor of Veterinary Epidemiology and Senior Lead for VetCompass, Royal Veterinary College, UK, talking about what we don’t know about primary veterinary care of liver disease and why not – the VetCompass story and two leading human hepatologists who will give us the medical perspective which we hope will inspire us: Professor Jonathan Fallowfield (Chair of Translational Liver Research and Principal Investigator, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh who will talk about his recent and current experience in multi-centre studies and Dr Vishal Patel, Adjunct Reader in Hepatology, Consultant Hepatologist and Principal Investigator, The Roger Williams Institute of Liver Studies and King’s College London who will talk about studies in the oral-gut-liver axis in human chronic liver disease and its implications in portal hypertension We hope to see you in Berlin or on-line! The SCH Scientific committee Dog liver disease – some unanswered questions Decreasing the incidence of copper associated hepatopathy in the dog: with more appropriate diets, developing a serum or urinary marker, or better therapeutic options. Address the misconception that inflammation causes copper accumulation. Effective treatment to reverse hepatic fibrosis which would require a way of noninvasively monitoring portal hypertension and liver stiffness The effect of the microbiota/microbiome on liver/biliary tract disease and hepatic encephalopathy Development of serum and tissue markers of immune hepatitis What is the role of microthrombi in the progression of hepatic disorders in the dog, particularly gallbladder mucoceles, chronic hepatic and vacuolar disease? Value of anticoagulant versus procoagulant therapy and when is each appropriate. Etiology , pathogenesis and therapy of degenerative vacuolar hepatopathy Are we sure there isn’t a viral cause of canine chronic hepatitis? Whatever happened to acidophil cell hepatitis virus? Better understanding of the progression of disease in acute liver failure in the dog so as to determine treatment strategies that increase survival Cat liver disease – some unanswered questions Understanding the causes of feline acute and chronic biliary tract disease – better stratification of disease types with antibody tests, imaging and pathology Establishing patient registries of cats with chronic biliary tract disease to understand response to treatment, long term prognosis (recovery or waxing and waning) and chronic sequelae including neoplasia. Better studies of the predictive ability of advanced imaging (CT and MRI) in cats with hepatobiliary disease and biliary obstruction Role of “the common channel” anatomy and pancreaticobiliary malfunction in feline inflammatory hepatobiliary disease What is the appropriate length of antibiotic therapy in cats with acute neutrophilic cholangitis/cholecystitis? Prospective treatment trials with immunosuppressants in cats with lymphocytic cholangitis: maybe prednisone is not the answer Standards of care (anaesthesia and surgical) in managing in cats undergoing biliary surgery Microbiota/microbiome impact on liver/biliary disease</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Aspergillus treatment</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31376/aspergillus-treatment/248997#248997</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:83c94547-6b22-46ef-a18d-5d9c0ae15ae3</guid><dc:creator>Pauline Jamieson</dc:creator><description>Hi Jon, My experience has been different. Where only one side appears to be affected and I that one side, this disease has a nasty habit of reappearing. So I treat both. However, it is unclear to me whether this is because the infection was not properly cleared and was in fact lurking on the other side, or whether this is reinfection in a susceptible patient. In which case this bilateral treatment was probably unnecessary. Most studies report very short follow-up times and the recurrences are often several to many months later, and the treatment is so expensive and often invasive that I suspect a lot of recurrences never make it back to the referral clinic if that is where they are treated. Rather the owners may give up. So we may be getting a false report of where these dogs are 2 years later. Pauline</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: Aspergillus treatment</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31376/aspergillus-treatment</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:dd753ec5-d9c5-4ef6-9555-4846c375ab53</guid><dc:creator>Jon Camilleri</dc:creator><description>Dear all I cannot recall from the excellent aspergillus talk at SamSoc last year whether, in the setting of unilateral disease and a normal appearing contralateral side both on CT and rhinoscopy, it is recommended to treat both sides with antifungal solution and cream or if its OK to just treat the affected side. Must admit I have in the past just treated the affected side (both if bilateral obviously) and so far success rates have been good Regards Jon</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248976#248976</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:563de493-54d4-4666-bbc7-b240279b7fbd</guid><dc:creator>Steve Leonard</dc:creator><description>Thanks Katherine, In your chats with vets in other countries did you get an idea of how concerned they are with regards zoonotic risk? Looking at the world maps it seems that it&amp;#39;s only Western Europe, Australia and NZ that are currently considered clear so tens of thousands of vets and millions of pet owners are potential exposed every year. My colleagues are thankfully very open minded still about whether the B.canis is responsible for their symptoms or it was found just because they looked for it after having symptoms that could have been caused by another agent. With potentially lots of UK born dogs having already contracted B.canis as well in the many years we have been importing dogs from high risk areas are we really keeping our clinics clear of this bug by testing only foreign born dogs (as Joanna has noted)? Still none the wiser but it does seem we could do with linking up with vets/institutions in endemic areas to see what can be learned. Anyone got any connections they can tap into?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248953#248953</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:911efe93-ecf0-4348-b2af-62819b6b5290</guid><dc:creator>Katherine Clarke</dc:creator><description>Hi Steve, I am so sorry to hear about your colleague. I was the clinical lead for the development of the Brucella canis policy within Linnaeus and thus have done a lot of reading and chatting to foreign vets about Brucella to try and understand which countries should go on the &amp;#39;red&amp;#39; list. Spanish travelled dogs, I personally would say yes, you need to test every year if they go every year and waiting three months for seroconversion seems logical. We added Spain to the list around 18m ago when I became aware of three unrelated dogs imported from Spain who tested positive. The situation in the US is variable with some states seeing more Brucella that others. But honestly, it is very hard to determine true prevalence anywhere due to lack of screening of asymptomatic dogs. Happy to chat more if you need. Katherine</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248950#248950</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4990521c-d60d-4afb-a2c4-dccab17ad5ae</guid><dc:creator>Penny Watson</dc:creator><description>Hi Steve I am not an infectious disease expert but was wondering why you were particularly concerned about Spain - my brother lives there, with a dog, and I was not aware it was a particularly Brucella canis hot spot. So I did a quick literature review and found this. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771425002617?via%3Dihub I don&amp;#39;t think travelling is the problem - otherwise we would be worried about dogs going to Switzerland or Holland or indeed Canada. I think what we need to know is how it is transmitted and what animals would be at high risk - is it still believed to be transmitted largely at mating and abortions and through milk or is there more widespread dog to dog transmission? If the former, I suspect the reason we are less worried about dogs from Holland, Switzerland and Canada is because of responsible breeding in those countries which I hope would contain the disease. Hence why illegally exported dogs from anywhere are a problem. You could argue that this increased prevalence reported in those countries is due to increased testing- but I&amp;#39;ll leave the infectious disease experts to comment more.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248949#248949</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:0cfcf627-cb5c-49db-8697-0448e2a391c6</guid><dc:creator>Steve Leonard</dc:creator><description>Sorry Joanna, I thought I&amp;#39;d posted a thank you for this (but I obviously just thought it). As we are now hitting the Summer holidays and I am lined up for lots more AHC&amp;#39;s it&amp;#39;s occurred to me that we have plenty of clients who do travel to Spain (an at risk country) for a couple of weeks. How are these pets going to fit into our regimes? Do we test them for Brucellosis 3 months after returning every year? Does anyone have any contacts from the USA about B.canis over there? Is it on their radar as it is a &amp;#39;High Risk&amp;#39; country according to the maps I&amp;#39;ve seen.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248921#248921</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4f22befd-c4c5-4ef2-9fe8-3f2a5ceb8ac0</guid><dc:creator>Sara Ramsey</dc:creator><description>This is such an interesting thread and it is concerning given when you read the current guide lines...they tend to state that reproductive fluids are the highest risk, so I would say we are potentially complacent about other situations which aren&amp;#39;t &amp;quot;reproductive&amp;quot;. Currently we have access to corporate guidance and we are supposed to flag if an animal is imported but this isn&amp;#39;t done consistently, nor is recording which country they have come from. We don&amp;#39;t have many &amp;quot;imported rescues&amp;quot; so I wonder if that is why this is not on our radar? Definitely time to tighten up.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248920#248920</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 06:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:4595609f-6cf1-4033-a94a-55136516a010</guid><dc:creator>Joanna Hansen</dc:creator><description>Our hospital’s SOP for the last couple of years (and we’ve had a previous staff member test positive): -every dog on registering/appt booking is asked if they are UK born -if non-UK then the owner has a choice to pay a small surcharge and we wear PPE and disinfect room after, or they can be tested -if they have been tested prior to import we require a negative APHA test 3 months+ after import -no dog will be admitted to our hosp or have any diagnostic testing done without a negative brucella test. In the event of an emergency we have in-house snaps tests and as long as that is negative we will hospitalise a patient but continue to use PPE until a negative APHA test -no pregnant or immunocompromised individual is involved in taking bloods or caring for any non-tested dog -if we have a positive case (and we’ve had quite a few) we do offer a repeat test to owners. If that comes back negative then we do discuss euthanasia. If the owner doesn’t want to euthanise then we advise complete isolation from all dogs/public places. In terms of the veterinary care we will continue to offer we are telephone consulting wherever possible and still providing routine care with ppe and environmental decontamination but the owners are aware that we will not hospitalise or do any form of procedure that puts our staff at risk -euthanasia would be offered instead. -any dog in the same household as a positive dog is treated as though it is positive until a negative Brucella test 3 months after last contact with the positive dog Sadly however, we recently we had 2 1-year-old UK born (and untravelled) dogs test positive (they were symptomatic, and the stud dog had recently tested positive). They had been in our hospital multiple times for various reasons and had completely “slipped through the net” despite what we’d previously considered to be a rigorous SOP. I too would be interested to hear what others are doing….?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248919#248919</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:3ab23179-a09f-43b2-bb86-5767aacca6f0</guid><dc:creator>Steve Leonard</dc:creator><description>Another colleague from the same practice has been tested for B.canis and has come back positive. She had been having odd aches and pains in her joints, chills and fatigue so asked her GP to get tested. Not sure what the follow up is likely to be at this point as waiting on referral to specialist. Armed with this information we have increased our communication with regards testing dogs from outside the UK. We are trying to be level headed with the messaging and couching it in terms of gathering data to quantify the level of disease to help the profession and the government get a handle on the prevalence. What we really haven&amp;#39;t nailed down is what we are going to do if/when we get a positive case. Different vets have very different attitudes to risk and this presents a huge dilemma for deciding the level of care you can reasonably give as a practice. I would be happy to do a home visit to perform a low risk procedure such as vaccination but what happens when this dog cuts itself badly in the owner&amp;#39;s garden? Is it ok to bleed all over the car park, waiting room and throughout the practice? What if the vet is happy to see it but the nurse isn&amp;#39;t or vice versa? Has anyone got an SOP in place for positive cases already? I did speak to Blood Donor Helpline. Not that helpful. They are aware of the disease, as expected, but only interested in symptomatic people. They asked the question &amp;quot;Have you been in contact with a dog with B.canis?&amp;quot; - well, how do I answer that currently? Not sure, I&amp;#39;ll get back to you....</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Brucella Canis in Veterinary Professionals</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31364/brucella-canis-in-veterinary-professionals/248898#248898</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:0d02b20c-00ff-413a-97fb-70668ab7d96e</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Kent</dc:creator><description>I would love to hear how others are currently approaching travelled dogs given the above. I find it an impossible balance - trying to juggle an appropriate degree of caution but without depriving large groups of dogs of appropriate care and causing panic amongst colleagues and clients. Plus (at least in our experience) the added risk of being basked on social media for expressing any degree of concern! So we are trying to be pragmatic about it but not sure what that should really look like! Great topic to discuss :-) Andy</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: Canine Biome analysis</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/associations/samsoc/f/small-animal-medicine-society/31366/canine-biome-analysis/248897#248897</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 10:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:332f8cf7-992e-437e-91df-4aba2f4d141a</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Kent</dc:creator><description>Where I have seen reports from these and other companies my general impression is that the evidence base we have simply does not support the conclusions that are made. It can be &amp;#39;interesting&amp;#39; but I think we are a long way from the point where any real therapeutic decisions can be made based on the results. Andy</description></item></channel></rss>