<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.vetsurgeon.org/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Evelyn Barbour-Hill's Activities</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/members/ebhvet</link><description>Evelyn Barbour-Hill's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Is the end of the RCVS nigh?</title><link>https://www.vetsurgeon.org/f/non-clinical-questions/31372/is-the-end-of-the-rcvs-nigh</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 09:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">146601cc-3922-4be7-9974-7e1d4e45a66b:6d3ec08d-7820-41bf-9ba4-eaedc695c22e</guid><dc:creator>Arlo Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/b/veterinary-news/posts/mps-call-for-end-to-veterinary-self-regulation"&gt;https://www.vetsurgeon.org/b/veterinary-news/posts/mps-call-for-end-to-veterinary-self-regulation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As stated, the EFRA position seems more ideologically driven than evidence based. Not sure I agree that just because other professions are independently regulated, that means the vet profession should be too, or that consumer confidence would necessarily be improved.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, for as long as I have worked on the periphery, there has been this tension about an organisation whose members often seem to feel should be working in their interests.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not to mention the fact that voter turnout has never quite been like the Harrods sale.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think? Do you care much either way?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>